You are viewing an old version of this page. Return to the latest version.
Difference between revisions of "Announcement/Log4Shell"
(Tag: Visual edit) |
(Tag: Visual edit) |
Contents
Event[edit | edit source]
Log4j vulnerability
Current vulnerability assessment in BlueSpice (overview)[edit | edit source]
-
BlueSpice free, pro, farm:
- On-premise installations are not affected.
- The Docker version is not affected.
- BlueSpice Cloud is not affected.
This is true for instances that we have installed. Customers have to check their part of the installation (i.e., OS, additional packages, etc.)
Detailed vunlerability assessment[edit | edit source]
Inspected components in BlueSpice[edit | edit source]
-
ElasticSearch => ElasticSearch reports that they are not affected:
https://discuss.elastic.co/t/apache-log4j2-remote-code-execution-rce-vulnerability-cve-2021-44228-esa-2021-31/291476
No code-red alert, but we keep an eye on it. => not vulnerable -
Java-Server
- Tomcat => explicit configuration of log4j is necessary. By default, log4j is not activated. We do not change this. => not vulnerable
- Jetty => explicit configuration of jetty is necessary. By default, log4j is not activated. We do not change this. => not vulnerable
-
Java Webservices
- xhtmlrenderer => a log4j plugin exists, but is not used by our service => not vulnerable
- VisualDiff => uses daisydiff + others. Does not use log4j => not vulnerable
- LaTeX2png => uses the jlatexmath library. Does not use log4j => not vulnerable
-
Draw.io reports that the appication is not affected:
https://twitter.com/drawio/status/1470061320066277382 => not vulnerable
Inspected components in the Docker image[edit | edit source]
The ist list of Docker files in the activated packages has been inspected. => not vulnerable
==Event== Log4j vulnerability *https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228 *[https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Cybersicherheitswarnungen/DE/2021/2021-549032-10F2.pdf;jsessionid=95F784B3CFE46DE89B51FC06804C4AEA.internet081 BSI warning from 12/12/2021 (CVE-2021-44228)] ==Current vulnerability assessment in BlueSpice (overview)== *BlueSpice free, pro, farm: **On-premise installations are <span class="col-turquoise">'''not affected'''</span>. **The Docker version is <span class="col-turquoise">'''not affected'''</span>. *BlueSpice Cloud is <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not affected'''</span>. This is true for instances that we have installed. <span class="col-red">'''Customers have to check their part of the installation'''</span> (i.e., OS, additional packages, etc.) ==Detailed vunlerability assessment== ===Inspected components in BlueSpice=== *'''ElasticSearch''' => ElasticSearch reports that they are not affected: <br />https://discuss.elastic.co/t/apache-log4j2-remote-code-execution-rce-vulnerability-cve-2021-44228-esa-2021-31/291476 <br />No code-red alert, but we keep an eye on it. => <span class="col-turquoise">'''not vulnerable'''</span> *'''Java-Server''' **Tomcat => explicit configuration of log4j is necessary. By default, log4j is not activated. We do not change this. => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> **Jetty => explicit configuration of jetty is necessary. By default, log4j is not activated. We do not change this. => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> *'''Java Webservices''' **xhtmlrenderer => a log4j plugin exists, but is not used by our service => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> **VisualDiff => uses daisydiff + others. Does not use log4j => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> **LaTeX2png => uses the jlatexmath library. Does not use log4j => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> *'''Draw.io''' reports that the appication is not affected: <br />https://twitter.com/drawio/status/1470061320066277382 => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> ===Inspected components in the Docker image=== The istlist of Docker files in the activated packages has been inspected. => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> *https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-44228
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
===Inspected components in the Docker image=== | ===Inspected components in the Docker image=== | ||
− | The | + | The list of Docker files in the activated packages has been inspected. => <span class="col-turquoise ve-pasteProtect">'''not vulnerable'''</span> |
*https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-44228 | *https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-44228 |